| A CFO, vacationing in Hawaii, pulls his iPad from his beach bag. He reviews the monthly reports prepared by his team (who have been toiling back at the office) and their accounting packages. With a few clicks he reviews the ledgers and reports, and compiles a packet of .pdf reports for the board meeting next week. He fires off the packet to his finance committee members via email, and returns to his chaise. All in a day’s work!
Technology and automation has always been about the promise to do more with less with your accounting packages. And this is certainly the case with the newest offerings based on “cloud computing”. Do those promises hold up? Let’s take a closer look at some of the pros and cons.
First let’s identify a few terms.
Cloud computing is a term coined by the “cloud” symbol typically used on flow charts to represent activity on the internet. Data is sent into the cloud, functions are processed, and data is returned to the user or some other constituent. Applications using cloud computing perform their functions off-site.
Hosted solutions generally involve the end user purchasing the application software or accounting package, and paying a provider to house (host) the software on a server located at the providers location. These sites are usually secure data warehouses, protected from natural disasters, and with multiple levels of back-up to insure data security. The provider charges a periodic fee for their service, while the client pays for the software license and on-gong costs for upgrades and any maintenance and support fees.
Software As A Service, or SaaS models, typically involve the provider owning the software license and the user subscribing to use the application for a period of time. As in a hosted solution, many of the technical tasks are performed by the provider (back-ups, upgrades, etc.) The cost to the user in this case includes not only the expense of hosting the application or accounting package, but also a fee to use the application.
If we look more closely at the benefits of these models, we see that there are both pro’s and con’s.
Technology Outsourcing - On the benefit side of the ledger, a reduction in both technical infrastructure and internal skills could be recognized. Since the servers providing the storage and processing are at the provider’s location, on their equipment, internal requirements for these resources are reduced – at least for these functions. But therein can be the mitigating factor to recognizing these savings. If the technical resources are required in-house for other functions that are not outsourced, then these savings are not fully realized.
Reduce initial investment– As opposed to purchasing an application outright and housing it on-site, SaaS and hosted solutions provide potential savings in hardware and software outlays. This can certainly allow access to an otherwise price prohibitive application. However, many traditional licensed providers offer leasing terms that may also allow a user to spread payments over time. A thorough financial analysis on “total cost of ownership” is required. In addition, factors such as budget / funds availability and preferences in recording the investment may impact the decision. For example, an organization may have approval to purchase a system outright (or not), or may prefer to pay for their system as a current expense (SaaS) versus a capital expenditure (licensed).
Reduce Payroll / Increase productivity – Time savings realized through the reduction of the maintenance of the system may translate to either reduction of overall staffing or reallocate of resources to more productive tasks. Of course this is generally one of the objectives of any system upgrade – to relieve talented staff of “task related” activities and allow them to focus on more analytical issues. In addition, the ability of off-site users (such as accountants and/or auditors) to access the system remotely may reduce the need for full-time, in-house skill sets.
Scalability / Functionality – For subscription and hosted services, access is usually based on a per user basis. And as an organization’s needs change, users can be added or removed. In a similar fashion, SaaS providers sometimes offer individual subscriptions on a function basis (AR/Billing, payroll, HR, etc.) Therefore functionality can be added or removed as needed. On an in-house, licensed model, users and functionality can generally be added. However, removing users or functions will not result in a refund of the license purchase, although it may reduce on-going maintenance expenses.
Off-Site Access – Hosted and SaaS applications can generally be accessed from anywhere. Users can easily log-in to the system from home or other offices. A user in an out-of-town hotel can log-in and review a client record, run a report, or update expense information. In addition, ... |
Article Details